Should There Be a Mandatory Driving Test for People 75 and Up?
By Paula Spencer Scott, Caring.com senior editor
Giving up the car keys is a painful passage for most drivers. Ideally, elder drivers recognize if and when they've become a hazard on the road and make the decision on their own to no longer drive.
Take my 93-year-old great aunt: "I miss driving more than anything else," she told me today. She's still razor sharp and amazingly spry, no chronic disorders beyond osteoporosis "and they recently found a tiny bit of high blood pressure." But when she moved to a new state three years ago to live with a niece, she decided, matter of factly, that for her, being 90 meant it was time to take no more chances and sell her car.
But like I said, she's still mentally sharp. When dementia enters the picture, the driver often lacks the self awareness or judgment to realize she's a growing road risk. Then what?
Then it's the family's worry burden.
Unless you live in Japan. There, beginning in June, everyone over age 75 who wants to renew a driver's license will be required to take a cognitive test, attend a lecture, and take an hour of special driver training.
The test lasts 30 minutes and involves:
- Writing the current date and time
- Looking at 14 illustrations (such as of animals) and being asked to write descriptions of them
- Drawing a picture of a clock showing a certain time.
A mandatory cognitive test for older drivers sounds like a why-didn't-we-think-of-that idea. Some reasons why:
- It transfers the burden of concern to the authorities – goodness knows they make a lot of other rules to help keep the roads safe.
- It makes "the system" act like the "bad cop" in this fraught issue, so families don't have to be.
- It's universal, so everyone of a certain age has to pass it. Three-fourths of elders in a trial in Japan passed completely, and only 2 percent showed definite decline. (Twenty-four percent showed slight decline, and these cases are counseled to talk to their families and doctors; it's not clear how long the license is renewed for.)
- It's simple and considered accurate. The Japanese test was developed with experts on dementia.
- It makes the wanna-be drivers share the cost of public safety – you have to pay for the test yourself, 650 yen (about $6.50).
- It elevates awareness generally about the risks of dementia and driving.
- It makes dementia-free older drivers like my great aunt feel good when they pass, more data they can factor into the complicated decision over whether to stay behind the wheel or take no more unnecessary chances.
What if you don't live in Japan and are one of the millions left worrying because someone with dementia driving has become an issue in your family? Be sure you know what to do if a dangerous driver refuses to stop driving.
I personally think it would be age discrimination to require seniors at 75 to take a cognitive test, attend a lecture and put a sticker on their car stating they are old people. I am 74, work full time, and by necessity drive to work, and run errands, and see my grandkids. I can see, think and have a perfect driving record. If I can pass the eye exam I see no reason why I should be subjected to any further tests when my license is up for renewal, in two years,when I am 76 years old, and just getting ready to retire.
I agree with the mandatory testing for drivers over 75 that Japan has initiated, but what this article fails to tell you is that these older drivers are forced to place two big magnetic yellow and orange stick ons on to their car to tell other drivers that they are old people...THAT I find wholly unacceptable. I find it to be humiliating and degrading to the older folks, and I know first hand that many of the Japanese feel that way, as my FIL is Japanese, and he hates that darn stick on. It makes him feel singled out and that it just tells everyone that he's older and makes him a target. He passed the test, why must he do anything else......I sure hope the USA doesn't follow that.
"Should there be a mandatory driving test for people 75 and up?" Yes. And not just once: I think everyone should have to take a driving test periodically starting at 75. I know some people will say it's ageism, but by that logic, so are "graduated" licenses (used by many states to ensure safe driving habits among young people). The fact of the matter is, older drivers are more likely to get into fatal accidents than other adults. That's not discrimination, it's statistics.
I am a 70 yr. old female and I honestly believe that, by age 75, I may need to have my driving privileges revoked. As we get older, not only are most of us more physically frail, but our minds are not as sharp as they were even 10 yrs ago. My aunt, 83 at the time, finally sold her car, after t-boning a pickup truck carrying a 3 yr. old child. Yes, I want to drive as long as I can do so w/o endangering others, but I hope I'm aware enough to give up my keys, when the time is here.
My grandmother had Alzheimers' Disease. My mother and her sisters had to take her car away from her because it was dangerous for her to be driving. My grandmother hated to have her car taken from her like a child; but my mother and her sisters had to do what was in the best interest of the general public.